Criticism | September 01, 1983
Symposium: The Role of the Critic / The Role of the Reviewer
The relationship between literary criticism and book reviewing is the focus of the following symposium.
Is this one of those unspoken controversies that continues to bubble along, influencing opinions, decisions, and judgements? Do reviewers suspect that scholar critics are afraid or incapable of making value judgements about any books which aren’t already
safely canonized? Do they believe literary criticism is dull and irrelevant, as self-referential as alchemy? Do critics, on the other hand, see reviewers as merely puff writers or ax grinders, corrupted by the tides of the marketplace? Have the two roles
become mutually exclusive and, if so, why? Is this either a necessary or healthy state of affairs?
Here, some respected scholar/critics and critic/reviewers offer their comments about such questions. We welcome further responses by our readers.
If you are a student, faculty member, or staff member at an institution whose library subscribes to Project Muse, you can read this piece and the full archives of the Missouri Review for free. Check this list to see if your library is a Project Muse subscriber.
Want to read more?
Subscribe TodaySEE THE ISSUE
SUGGESTED CONTENT
Criticism
Jul 19 2023
Reading Projects
Reading Projects By William Roebuck Some people collect stamps. Others throw axes or play quidditch. From the Middle English term, hobyn, denoting a toy horse and hence an activity done… read more
Criticism
Sep 01 1983
The Critic, The Reviewer, and Reader-Response
The full text of this feature is not currently available online.
Criticism
Sep 01 1983
Lace or Steel
The full text of this feature is not currently available online.