Dispatches | May 20, 2010
Should I Take This Personally?
Rejection is a significant part of a writer’s life. Everyone gets rejected. This is simply the way it is for writers, whether you are an emerging writer or A Very Famous Writer. You can read a list here of 30 famous authors who were turned down by various publishers (tip o’the cap to Nathan Bransford for posting this on his blog, via The Rejectionist). Often, as noted in the link, these rejections are given with no sense that there is a real live person who put so much time and energy into the manuscript.
The Missouri Review makes an effort to write comments on our rejection letters. According to Duotrope, about one in three of our writers receives a personal note. Sometimes, this is as simple as a little ink on the rejection slip (when I get rejected, which is often, I for one, absolutely count the “Sorry” scrawled on the rejection letter as “personal” even if, well, really, I’m being a wee bit optimistic counting that as a personal note). Sometimes, there are acknowledgements of what is working in the poem or story, and sometimes, there is a little bit more, getting into the specifics of what didn’t quite work.
What does this mean?
To be pragmatic, it means that your work has been turned down. It means No. Nothing more or less than that. This is one simple, rational, and perhaps mind-saving way of looking at the rejection process. It doesn’t, ultimately, mean your work is good or bad. It’s one subjective opinion from our staff.
So, why do we bother to write anything at all? Because we’re writers, too. And because we know what it means to the writer, somewhere, to get that response, however small, knowing that we simply can’t do it for everyone. Why not? Because we receive 14,000 submissions every year. We simply can’t write back to every writer. There is no way we could do so and still publish a quarterly literary journal.
How we decide who to write to and what to write is, like the submission process itself, a subjective response driven by experience. I write the author back when the work deserves it. I write back when the work has those moments that open your eyes and makes me feel I’m no longer reading something too familiar, too commonplace. My comments are always sincere and encouraging, and however brief, when my name appears on a rejection, it should give the writer (I hope) encouragement that the story was engaging, worth reading, in fact, demands to be read. So keep at it. Write more. Read more. Send us your next poem, your next story, your next essay. Be stubborn and be hopeful. Don’t let our rejections, or anyone else’s, get you down.
SEE THE ISSUE
Feb 28 2020
2020 Miller Guest Judge in the Spotlight: Alex Sujong Laughlin
2020 Miller Audio Prize Guest Judge Alex Sujong Laughlin shares her journey to becoming an audio producer, the lens through which she sees the world, and how TikTok makes her
Oct 15 2019
Last Call for Submissions to the Jeffrey E. Smith Editors’ Prize
The LASY DAY to enter TMR‘s Editors’ Prize has arrived And with it, the last call. The 29th Annual Jeffrey E. Smith Editors’ Prize Contest closes tonight! You have the rest of
Mar 08 2019
Interview with 2019 Miller Audio Prize Guest Judge Cher Vincent
Our guest judge this year, Cher Vincent (she/her), is an audio producer based in Chicago. She is currently Lead Audio Producer for One Illinois, a nonprofit news outlet, covering statewide news and producing